Legal Opinion
State v. Caicedo
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 10, 1993No. 92-2273PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
622 So.2d 149 (1993)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Alexis CAICEDO, Appellee.
No. 92-2273.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
August 10, 1993.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Avi J. Litwin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
Before FERGUSON, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
LEVY, Judge.
The State appeals a non-final order granting the defendant's motion to suppress evidence. Based upon our conclusion that the particular facts of this case, viewed under the totality of the circumstances,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- P.L.R. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Steele v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Blanding v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- State v. MayaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Post v. City of Fort LauderdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Post v. City of Fort LauderdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Revels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Burnette v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Chaney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.