Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Sinclair

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 20, 1944No. 15,358; No. 15,359PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

The over-all question presented by these two cases for review, and consolidated for disposition, has to do with the allocation of revenues arising from ad valorem levies, on malt, vinous and spirituous liquors. In case *178No. 15358, a county treasurer, perplexed as to his duty in relation to the allocation of such revenues, sought a declaratory judgment in the premises. The trial court there adjudged that section 2 (b) of the old age constitutional amendment (Article XXIV) operates upon all taxes on liquor, including ad valorem taxes, but that such provision “is not self-executing.” In case No.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Interrogatories of the GovernorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Fairall v. FrisbeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lobato v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. Carrara Place, Ltd. v. Arapahoe County Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Submission of Interrogatories on Senate Bill 93-74Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Post v. City of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  5. Cass v. Colorado Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API