Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Corrado Jack W. Tocco Vito W. Giacalone Nove Tocco Anthony J. Corrado
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 27, 2000No. 98-2315PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.
The five named defendants in this case were convicted of conspiracy under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), as alleged members of the Detroit Mafia. Based on those convictions, the government sought a forfeiture against the defendants pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1968(a)(3), and the parties agreed to have the district judge decide the forfeiture amount. On October 23, 1998, the district court issued an order finding that the government was not entitled to any forfeiture, because, among other things, the evidence was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Edwin Edwards Stephen Edwards Cecil Brown Andrew Martin Bobby JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- United States v. Anthony Bruno, Angelo Cerasulo, John Imbrieco, Mario Fortunato and Carmine PolitoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Don S. McAuliffeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.