Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Montague

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1912No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Alexander Smith Cochran and another, as surviving trustees, etc., and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of November, 1911, striking out part of the amended answers of the said defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This action was brought by the city against the receiver of the Fulton Street Eailroad Company, the receivers of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company and "other street railway companies to abate a nuisance. The appellants are bondholders of the Fulton Street Railroad Company. They were permitted to intervene in behalf of themselves and all other bondholders of said company similarly situated. Their first pleading was a demurrer, and their demurrer and a demurrer interposed by the receiver of the Fulton Street Railroad Company were argued together and were sustained at Special…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of New York v. United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. City of New York v. MontagueNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  3. City of New York v. MontagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of New York v. MontagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. City of New York v. MontagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API