Legal Opinion

Horne v. KENOSHA LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

265 Wis. 496 (1953)

HORNE, Respondent,

vs.

KENOSHA LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 3, 1953.

December 30, 1953.

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Earle Munger of Kenosha.

For the respondent there was a brief by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and oral argument by Leo E. Vaudreuil.

MARTIN, J.

The first question presented is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that a contract existed between the parties whereby plaintiff was to receive a three per cent commission on the gross parts sales.

As pointed out by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Brown v. Oneida Knitting Mills, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Horne v. KENOSHA LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API