Horne v. KENOSHA LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
265 Wis. 496 (1953)
HORNE, Respondent,
vs.
KENOSHA LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., Appellant.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
December 3, 1953.
December 30, 1953.
For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Earle Munger of Kenosha.
For the respondent there was a brief by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and oral argument by Leo E. Vaudreuil.
MARTIN, J.
The first question presented is whether there is sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding that a contract existed between the parties whereby plaintiff was to receive a three per cent commission on the gross parts sales.
As pointed out by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chase v. HinkleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Brown v. Oneida Knitting Mills, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Horne v. KENOSHA LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953