Legal Opinion
Raleigh v. Stoecker (In Re Stoecker)
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 31, 1990No. 90 C 2502, 89 B 2873 and 90 A 0034PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEINENWEBER, District Judge.
On January 16, 1990, the trustee in the bankruptcy proceeding of William J. Stoecker brought a fraudulent conveyance action in this court against defendant Grace M. Stoecker. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a) and General Rule 2.33 of this district, the trustee’s adversary complaint was ■automatically referred to the bankruptcy court. Defendant has now moved for withdrawal of the automatic reference on grounds that she has demanded a jury trial and that the bankruptcy court lacks both the constitutional and the statutory authority to conduct…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Schoenthal v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In the Matter of Grabill Corporation, Camdon Companies, Incorporated, Foxxford Group Limited, Debtors. Appeal of Ncnb National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Scherer v. CarrollDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1993
- Bertholet v. HarmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- In Re RheubanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1991
- Pongetti v. Lee (In Re Bingham Systems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.