Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judge:
The single question here presented is whether the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may refer to private contract pricing provisions to assist it in identification of natural gas whose production entails such extraordinary risks or costs that it would not be undertaken absent the availability of a special incentive price. We hold both that it has the authority to do so, and that it has in this instance used that authority in a manner neither arbitrary nor capricious, but reasonably related to attainment of the controlling, congressionallydefined,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- True Oil Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Midwest Gas Users Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arco Oil and Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Nielson-True Pshp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
- Rocanville Corporation v. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.