Legal Opinion

Bucaretzky v. Swersky

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph S. Levine, J.

The defendants move for an order pursuant to CPLR 3124, compelling the plaintiff to respond to several demands for disclosure. The plaintiff opposes this motion and cross-moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 3106, reversing the priority of depositions.

*137The disclosure sought by the defendants is the identity of the plaintiffs’ religious advisors. This unusual request arises from the nature of the medical malpractice action. Mrs. Bucaretzky, a plaintiff, gave birth to a daughter in May 1990. The child was born with Down’s syndrome. The complaint alleges…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De'Udy v. De'UdyNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rhoda C. v. Amos C.New York City Family Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API