Legal Opinion
Scaringe v. Ackerman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 1986PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (119 AD2d 327). We add that our decision does not preclude a future challenge to respondent Ackerman’s qualifications in the appropriate forum (see, NY Const, art III, § 9; Matter of Harwood v Meisser, 41 AD2d 531, affd 31 NY2d 1000).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Kaye.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scaringe v. AckermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Harwood v. MeisserNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Harwood v. MeisserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
3Cited by21 opinions
- New York State Committee of the Independence Party v. New York State Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Ferguson v. CheesemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Lewis v. GarfínkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Independence Party v. New York State Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hoerger v. SpotaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.