Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Kilbourn

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 6, 1944PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries sustained by the breaking of wires around a bale of hay prepared by the defendant for delivery to the plaintiff’s employer. A verdict for the plaintiff was recorded under leave reserved by the judge, who subject to the plain-, tiff’s exception allowed a motion of the defendant to enter a verdict in his favor.

According to the bill of exceptions certain facts “were established by the evidence and were not in dispute”: On April 15, 1939, the plaintiff and three other employees of a Dr. Desmond went to Lancaster to a barn, occupied by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Mucha v. Northeastern Crushed Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Childs v. American Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Ruffin v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Doherty v. BoothMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Woronka v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Friese v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. West v. Molders Foundry Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Poulin v. H. A. Tobey Lumber Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Davenport v. SquibbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API