Carr v. General Incandescent Arc Light Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Appeal from an order of the Special Term, dated ¡November 29, 1901, vacating and setting aside order for examination of plaintiff before trial.
1Opinion of the Court
¡Eüascall, J.
We are inclined to hold with the appellant that the evidence sought on the examination must be offered by it ,(61 N. Y. 362; also opinion by Schuchman, J., 41 N. Y. Supp. 114); but, so far as we can learn by the papers submitted, the order appealed from was vacated because of irregularity in retquiring the examination to take place in a county other than that of plaintiff’s residence or place of business, and not because of laches. Moreover, the amended answer is dated ¡¡November 2, 1901, and the order to show cause is dated the nineteenth of that month; so the theory is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howard v. . DalyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Herbage v. . City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Tanenbaum v. HilbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899