Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Manning v. Hagan

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Habeas Corpus proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

The relator, who was convicted of disorderly conduct before a city magistrate, seeks by a writ of habeas corpus to review the conviction. This cannot be done, there being no question that the magistrate had jurisdiction of the offense charged, and authority to inflict the punishment imposed. The relator, following a practice which seems to have prevailed for a number of years, sued out simultaneously with the writ of habeas corpus, a writ of certiorari. For this practice there is neither necessity nor warrant of law. The writ of certiorari issued in this proceeding does not bring before the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Taylor v. SeamanNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Eisen v. FlynnNew York Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API