Feister v. Kent
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Iowa District Court. — Hon. S. H. Fairall, Judge. Action for work, labor, and board. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
*41 *2I. Plaintiff entered into defendant’s employment as a clerk in his store on March 8, 1888, and so continued until September 6, 1889. Plaintiff claims that by a verbal agreement between him and defendant the latter was to compensate him for his services as follows: For the first month, his board, and after that time what his services were reasonably worth; that his services were reasonably worth thirty dollars per month from April 8 to May 15,1888; and that from the latter date until September 6, 1889, he had the care and management of defendant’s store under the casual supervision of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pelamourges v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Edwards & Beardsley v. Cottrell & BabcockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Murray v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Wood v. WhittonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Shroeder v. WebsterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Henderson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Guth v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Hampton v. BurrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Herkimer v. KeelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Huss v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.