Legal Opinion

Vosburg Co. v. Watts

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1915No. 1282PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina, at Columbia; Henry A. Middleton Smith, Judge. Suit in equity by R. C. Watts and others against the Vosburg Company. Decree for complainants, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPP, Circuit Judge.

The appellees in this case (plaintiffs below) are the owners of the tract of land described in the complaint. P»y deed dated February 29, 1904, they conveyed all the timber thereon, “which will measure at the base, when cut, 12 inches or over in diameter,” to J. R. Paschall and others. The time allowed the grantees in which to cut and manufacture the timber sold was ten years; hut provision was made for an additional period of five years, if desired, for a stated consideration. Paschall and his associates subsequently conveyed to the N. L. Hoover Lumber Company, which…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. (AMERICAN) LUMBERMENS MUT. CAS. CO. v. Timms & HowardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Furman v. A. C. Tuxbury Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Acusport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  4. NAACP v. AcuSport, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2003
  5. Liberty Mut. Ins. v. GeraldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API