In re the Final Accounting of Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Breitel, J. (dissenting).
True, a court of another State or nation, competent under its own law to decide a dispute, with all necessary parties before it, and with jurisdiction over the subject matter, may render a judgment to which, as the case may be, the courts of this State will be bound by the Full Faith and Credit Clause to enforce, or may by comity accord recognition. But that is not this case. The California court was not competent. Although the California Superior Court is one of unlimited general jurisdiction in most matters, it is not when it functions as a probate court. In that…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Bishop v. BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.