Legal Opinion

Noe v. Executors of Miller

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On final hearing on bill, answers and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Yice-Chancellor.

This is a suit for a legacy. The complainant rests Ms right to recover on a bequest made to his intestate, Elizabeth M. Hoe, by her father. Her father died August 8th, 1869, and she, September 1st, 1874. She left two children, both 'born in the life-time of her father, one before he made his will and the other after. The will directs that, after the testator’s estate shall have been converted into money, it shall be divided into twelve shares, and then disposes of the several shares. The gift made to the complainant’s intestate is in the words:

“ I do give unto my daughter,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Westcott v. CadyNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  2. In re the Estate of ChristieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wyckoff v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Camden Trust Co. v. BirchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  3. Ferguson v. RippelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Leavy v. McDermottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API