Legal Opinion

Keeting v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Chariton Circuit Court. — Ron. Fred Lamb, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

Plaintiff’s action is to recover a statutory penalty of $300 (Sec. 3330, R. S. 1909) against defendant for negligently failing to promptly transmit and deliver a telegram which he sent from Kansas City to Keytesville, Missouri, on the night of the 22nd of February, 1915'. He recovered judgment in the trial court.

That the statute referred to allows the penalty is conceded, but defendant interposes a defense that on account of a sleet, and storm its wires were down and out of service which rendered it impossible to promptly transmit plaintiff’s message. The question in the case is altogether…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ayres v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Will v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API