Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided January 13, 1975Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUESTIONS: 1. Is s. 320.27, F.S., unconstitutional as applied to an automobile brokerage service? 2. Is an automobile brokerage service a "motor vehicle dealer" as defined in s. 320.27, F.S.?

SUMMARY: Statutes are presumptively valid and no opinion can be expressed on the constitutionality of a duly enacted statute absent a case or controversy arising in an adversary proceeding. An automobile brokerage service is a motor vehicle dealer as defined in s. 320.27, F.S., for which a license is required in order to operate. AS TO QUESTION 1: Regarding your inquiry on the constitutionality of s.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida State Racing Commission v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Evans, Et Ux. v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Moore v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  4. Conn v. E. Chadwick & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1880
  5. State v. British Leyland Motors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API