Legal Opinion

Stanley v. McElrath

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1889No. 12,187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco.

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, C.

This action was brought by C. M. Hitchcock, who has since died, to recover from the defendant the sum of $6,136.50, with interest, on account of the payment, for and on behalf of the defendant, of a certain promissory note made by him on February 11, 1879, for $4,500, with interest, payable to the order of Hitchcock, at the London & San Francisco Bank, Limited, on April 11, 1879, and which note he (Hitchcock) indorsed solely for the accommodation of defendant, who thereupon negotiated it to the said bank, and received the full amount of note in money for his own benefit, and then at…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. People ex rel. Carrillo v. De la GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Waldrip v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Lake Merced Water Co. v. CowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Curtis v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Popcorn Equipment Co. v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Tredway v. AntisdelMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API