People v. Lassic

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of two counts of robbery in the second degree (see Penal Law § 20.00; People v Carr-El, 287 AD2d 731, 733 [2001], affd 99 NY2d 546 [2002]) and conspiracy in the fourth degree (see People v Ackies, 79 AD3d 1050, 1056 [2010]) beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342…