Legal Opinion

Kerley v. Kerley

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1996No. 23220; No. 23506PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

2Per curiam

In Kerley v. Kerley, 111 Nev. 462, 893 P.2d 358 (1995), we reversed and remanded to the district court the issue of apportionment of the real property located at 1045 Verde Way. Thomas Kerley now petitions this court for rehearing.

*37In our prior opinion in this matter, we held that the formula set out in Malmquist v. Malmquist, 106 Nev. 231, 792 P.2d 372 (1990), did not apply to the apportionment of the Verde Way property. Part of the reason for our holding was our reliance on the district court’s legal conclusion that the real property deeds executed between Thomas and…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peardon v. PeardonNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Petition of FullerNevada Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Todkill v. TodkillNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Malmquist v. MalmquistNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Graham v. GrahamNevada Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re: Willie N. Moon and Adnette M. Gunnels-MoonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API