Legal Opinion

Lehman-Charley v. Bartlett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, John B. Bartlett and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff against said defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 16th day of March, 1909, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the Mew York Special Term, except in so far as said judgment dismisses the complaint as to the defendant Edward B. Peet.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The action was brought to rescind a purchase of stock of the j Beade-Duane Cold Storage Company, defendant, and to recover from the defendants the amount paid for the stock, based upon fraudulent statements in a circular alleged to have been issued by the defendants and upon which the plaintiff relied in - making the *676purchase. The complaint alleges that on or about September 14,

' 1906, the individual defendants, being then directors of the defendant corporation, prepared for general circulation, and with the intent that it should be distributed among the public, a certain pro- ■…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morgan v. . SkiddyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Lambert v. ElmendorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rives v. . BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Inman v. Credit Discount Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. African Metals Corp. v. TeeterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  4. Rives v. BartlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. J. C. Turner Lumber Co. v. LaceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API