Legal Opinion

Kagen v. Kagen

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHenry J. Latham, J.

This is a motion by plaintiffs (a) for counsel fees, (b) to require defendant “ to pay the sum of two thousand and no/100 ($2,000.00) dollabs for the vacation of the infant plaintiffs” and (c) to require defendant “ to pay ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-EIVE and UO/100 ($125.00) DOLLABS per week for the support of each 8 8 * [of the] infant plaintiffs ”. Defendant cross-moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 7) and on a defense founded upon documentary evidence (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 1).

Plaintiffs in this action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Langerman v. LangermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Guillermo v. GuillermoNew York City Family Court · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kagen v. KagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API