Legal Opinion

R. G. Britton, Appellant-Cross v. Harold Eugene Rogers, Appellee-Cross

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1980No. 79-1862, 79-1896PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KUNZIG, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the federal district court 1 granting a writ of habeas corpus. Appellee-cross appellant Rogers had been sentenced to life imprisonment by an Arkansas jury upon his conviction for first-degree rape. The parties have raised several questions under the due process, equal protection and cruel and unusual punishments clauses of the United States Constitution, in particular, the question whether sentencing guidelines are mandated in a non-capital case. For the reasons hereafter stated, we find no constitutional defect in Rogers’ conviction or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Cornelious Perry v. Ruth L. RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Futrell v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Thomas Winford Simmons v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Theophilis BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API