Legal Opinion

Speight Box & Panel Co. v. Ipock

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The plaintiff is entitled to a judgment against the sureties on the defendant’s undertaking according to the terms of the instrument, to be recovered in the original action. The sureties, within the limits of their obligation, are considered parties of record, and the defendants their principals. McDonald v. McBryde, 117 N. C., 125, 23 S. E., 103; Wallace v. Robinson, 185 N. C., 530, 117 S. E., 508; Trust Co. v. Hayes, 191 N. C., 542, 132 S. E., 466; Long v. Meares, 196 N. C., 211, 145 S. E., 7. It is upon this theory that judgment against the sureties is rendered in the original action to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Orange Trust Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. V. Wallace & Sons v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Nimocks v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  4. McDonald v. . McBrydeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Long v. . MearesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. HumphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. General Insurance Company of America v. DeenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Allied Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Environmental Quality CouncilWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Alligood Ex Rel. Alligood v. SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API