Covington Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion
by Mr. Justice Drew:
I cannot reconcile the reasoning and conclusion of the majority opinion, which cites numerous decisions of this Court stating the controlling principle of this case, and then fails to apply it. That principle, too well established to admit of contradiction, is that separate sheets of paper containing testamentary dispositions cannot be probated unless they are so connected by their internal sense that they form a completed whole, this fact appearing from the writings themselves without the aid of extrinsic evidence: Seiter’s Estate, 265 Pa. 202. In that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maginn's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Seiter's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Brown EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Stinson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Davis' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942