Legal Opinion
Penick & Ford, Ltd. v. Wagues-Pack & Haydel
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 3, 1920No. 22445PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Twenty-Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of St. James; Charles T. Wortham, Judge. Action by Penick & Ford, Limited, against lyaguespack & Haydel and others. From judgment sustaining exception of no cause of action and dismissing suit, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDawkins, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action and dismissing its suit. The action is upon a contract for the purchase of defendant’s crop of “blackstrap” molasses of 191-4-15, and reads as follows:
“Contract of Purchase and Sale.
“New Orleans, La., June 28, 1915.
“Penick & Ford, Limited, of New Orleans, Buyer, and Waguespack & Haydel, Represented by G. Cabiro, Broker, Seller.
“Article: Laura Blackstrap Molasses.
“Quantity: Crop 1944-15, estimated at one hundred and twenty thousand (120,000) gallons.
“Price: Five and three-quarter cents (5%$) per gallon f. o. b.…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hebert v. BrileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Starke Taylor & Sons, Inc. v. Riverside PlantationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Goudeau v. DaigleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- GULF RICE MILLING, INC. v. SonnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Kohler v. Huth Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.