Legal Opinion

Ballin v. . Dillaye

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 1867PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaiekeR, J.

The action in this case was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed hy the Defendant, then and now a married woman, and her husband. By stipulation of the parties judgment of foreclosure and sale was entered, leaving the question of the liability of the Defendant upon her bond for the deficiency, if any there should be, to be determined after it was ascertained that such deficiency existed, and the amount of it.

A sale of the mortgaged premises was had, and a deficiency reported of $6,643.73, and interest from February 2, 1864.

The Defendant acquired her title to the premises hy purchase upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North American Coal Co. v. DyettNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Dyett v. North American Coal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1838
  3. Gardner v. GardnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1838

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dollner, Potter & Co. v. SnowSupreme Court of Florida · 1877
  2. Meeker v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Heacock v. HeacockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. Carey & Co. v. Burruss & PitzerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Cashman v. . HenryNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API