Legal Opinion

Hinkley. v. City of Arkansas

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1895No. 619PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. This ivas a suit by the plaintiffs in error, Rufus H. Hinkley, George H. Richardson, and Henry St. John Smith, partners in business under the name of Swan & Barrett, against the defendant in error, the city of Arkansas City, a city of the second class of the state of Kansas, to recover the amount due on 170 coupons which were detached from certain refunding bonds that were issued, as the…

Read the full summary

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. This ivas a suit by the plaintiffs in error, Rufus H. Hinkley, George H. Richardson, and Henry St. John Smith, partners in business under the name of Swan & Barrett, against the defendant in error, the city of Arkansas City, a city of the second class of the state of Kansas, to recover the amount due on 170 coupons which were detached from certain refunding bonds that were issued, as the plaintiffs averred, by said city. The complaint, which was in the usual form, alleged, among other things, that before said…

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, Circuit Judge

The' case having been tried by the circuit court without the intervention of a jury, its findings bn the issues raised by the pleadings having been general, and no instruction having been asked in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence, we are limited in our consideration of the case to such errors as have been assigned relative to the admission or exclusion of testimony. No other errors that may have been committed by the trial court in the progress of the case are before us for review. Searcy Co. v. Thompson, 13 C. C. A. 349, 66 Fed. 92. Two exceptions seem to have been taken by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Burr v. Des Moines R. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Searcy County v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. Town of GranadaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. York v. WashburnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. Town of Aurora v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. City of Goldfield v. RogerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. International Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  5. Board of Com'rs v. National Life Ins. Co. of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API