Legal Opinion

In Re Strock

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1900No. L.A. No. 617PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Petition for involuntary insolvency of respondent. The grounds alleged are sale of property by respondent, being insolvent, with intent to delay, defraud, and hinder his creditors, and a payment made in contemplation of insolvency. (Insolvency Act of 1895, sec. 9.) Verdict and judgment for respondent. The appeal is from the judgment and order denying a new trial. The grounds are insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict, and errors in refusing or giving instructions.

1. The only specification of insufficiency of evidence is that "the evidence is wholly insufficient to justify or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Muller & KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Matthews v. ChaboyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spongberg v. First National Bank of MontpelierIdaho Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API