Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1923No. 24,358PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGause, J.

This was a prosecution against the appellant, Archie Young, alias “Joker” Young, and Harry Lee and John Neely, in which the defendants were jointly charged in a grand jury indictment with unlawfully keeping a certain room at 522 Indiana avenue in the city of Indianapolis, to be used and occupied for gaming.

The defendants were jointly tried and convicted, each defendant being fined $500 and being sentenced to the Indiana State Farm for a period of six months.

The appellant, Archie Young, has appealed and assigned as error the overruling, of his motion to quash the indictment, and the overruling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seller v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Whitney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. State v. McKinstrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McGee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Aikins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Blum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Pollard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. HAMMOND v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API