Legal Opinion
Central New York Coach Lines, Inc. v. Syracuse Herald Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1938PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.
For convenience we abbreviate the names of the parties. The Coach Corporation is plaintiff. The Herald Company is defendant.
While driving an automobile for the Herald Company, Arthur Grady lost his life when the vehicle collided with a motor bus of the Coach Corporation. Administration of his estate was granted to William H. Grady by letters “ limited to the prosecution of such action or actions as you, the said administrator, may be entitled to prosecute by special provision of law.”
The administrator sued the Coach Corporation to recover damages for"Arthur Grady’s death. A counterclaim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Downey v. . SeibNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Masten v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Beebe v. BullNew York Supreme Court · 1834
- Stone v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Davis v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Hernandez v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Winbush v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In re the Estate of ColonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
- Stutz v. Guardian Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.