Legal Opinion

Sarver v. Pace University

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided October 21, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

*71Order entered March 12, 2004 reversed, without costs, and the action is reinstated.

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action against his former employer, defendant Pace University, seeking damages for “[fjraud [in the] inducement, indemnification.” The court properly rejected the res judicata and collateral estoppel theories advanced by defendant in its pretrial motion to dismiss the action since, as the court noted, defendant failed to conclusively establish that the action “arise [s] from the same transaction and occurrence put forth in [plaintiffs] prior small claims…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Friedman v. Seward Park Housing Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1995

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rackowski v. ArayaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Loakman v. Transport Workers Union of Greater New York, Local 100Civil Court of the City of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API