Legal Opinion

Holt v. Virginia

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided June 28, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 83-0060-DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KISER, District Judge.

Petitioner, Gary R. Holt, presents his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254, attacking his state conviction for grand larceny. His petition raises questions of both jurisdiction and substance as follows: (1) whether Holt is “in custody” under the applicable federal habeas corpus statutes; and (2) whether his trial and conviction on a charge of grand larceny after having been acquitted of burglary was violative of the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Ronald James Dessus v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  5. Thomas Ribble Tucker, Jr. v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API