Legal Opinion
Botka v. Joseph T.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 1972No. Civ. 30445PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, J.
In advance of briefing and argument on this appeal on its merits, we here act upon appellants’ motion for an order of this court appointing counsel to serve on the appeal at public expense.
Appellants are the parents of the above named minor. Their appeal is from an order of the juvenile court declaring the minor to be a dependent child as defined in subdivision (a) of section 600 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, 1 and ordering him removed from appellants’ custody. (The present motion seeks the appointment of counsel to represent appellants, not the minor.) The order…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Meltzer v. C. Buck LeCraw & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ferguson v. KeaysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sutter Hospital v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cleaver v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Crist v. NJ Div. Youth and Family Serv.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Potvin v. KellerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- In Re SimethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Guardianship of PankeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.