Legal Opinion
Knopick v. UBS AG
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 2015No. 1:14-cv-2090PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
YVETTE KANE, District Judge
Before the Court is. Defendants UBS AG,-UBS SF, and Réne Elste’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 24.) The Court held oral argument on the motion on July 30, 2015. The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Defendants’ motion.
I. BACKGROUND1
This case concerns investment losses Plaintiff incurred while Defendants were managing his money. Plaintiff alleges he incurred losses because Defendants invested his money unwisely and against his…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- CHURCH VI v. GLENCORE PLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Pankaj Shah and Vipul Aggarwal, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Asia TV USA Limited and Zee Entertainment Enterprises LimitedDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025