Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1935No. Civ. 9267PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

As far as are material to this appeal, in substance the facts appear to be as follows: Prior to the date when the instant action was commenced in the lower court, in another action theretofore instituted the defendants in the instant action had recovered a judgment for approximately $43,000 against the assignors of plaintiff herein;—from which judgment an appeal was taken, with the result that said judgment was reduced to the sum of $3,500. (Russell v. Stillwell, 106 Cal. App. 88 [288 Pac. 785].) In the meantime, in a third action, as the result of a cross-complaint that' was filed therein by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. StillwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramirez v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API