Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ashby v. Haddock

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 17, 1962No. D-186PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STURGIS, Judge.

On the suggestion of the State of Florida ex rel., Clarence G. Ashby, T. S. Roberts, Jr., and The Barnett National Bank of Jacksonville, hereinafter called the “rela-tors”, who appear in their relation as executors and trustees under a document that was admitted to probate in the County Judge’s Court of Duval County as the will of Thurston Roberts, deceased, we issued a rule nisi in accordance with relators’ suggestion, requiring the Honorable Page Haddock, as judge of said court, hereinafter called the “respondent”, to show cause why a peremptory writ of prohibition should not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain LandsSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. City of St. Petersburg v. SieboldSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  3. McConiha v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Johnston v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Munnikhuysen v. MagrawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Askew v. SchusterSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Ashby v. HaddockSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  3. Estate of GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1995
  5. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API