Legal Opinion

Morgan Signs, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.

Morgan Signs, Inc. (Morgan), appeals from an order of the Secretary of Transportation (Secretary) denying Morgan’s exceptions to a proposed report of a Department of Transportation (DOT) hearing officer and making said report final.

The facts are as follows. A newly constructed limited access highway, to be known as Route 220 (Route 220) was to be officially opened by DOT in Antis Township on November 15, 1993 at 9:30 a.m.. Prior to this date and time, representatives of both Morgan and Penn Advertising (Penn) inquired with DOT as to when they could submit applications…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cheltenham Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. Dauphin County Social Services for Children & YouthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Keenan v. Scott Township AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Kashuba v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Hickox Construction)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API