Legal Opinion

Prusiner v. Holsberg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. David Mould, Judge. Action at law to recover a commission alleged to have been earned by plaintiff in negotiating a sale of defendant’s property. Trial to the court without a jury. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

The petition alleges that defendant, being the owner of a stock of goods which he desired to dispose of, requested and authorized plaintiff to find a purchaser therefor, and agreed to pay a reasonable compensation .for services so rendered. It is further alleged that plaintiff, acting under said authority, did in fact find and send to defendant a purchaser to whom a sale was effected, and that plaintiff thereby became entitled to receive from defendant a commission of $462.50, no part of which has been paid. The defendant, answering the claim, denies that he ever requested or employed the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. GrovierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Murray v. KeenanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API