Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1974No. Docket Nos. L.A. 30204, 30205Published

1Opinion of the Court

11 Cal.3d 274 (1974)

520 P.2d 978

113 Cal. Rptr. 162

ROSE W. LAMB, Petitioner,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, KEYSTONE ENGINEERING COMPANY et al., Respondents.

Docket Nos. L.A. 30204, 30205.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

April 19, 1974.

COUNSEL

Joseph E. Hall for Petitioner.

Franklin Grady, Sheldon C. St. Clair, Thomas J. McBirnie and Norman R. Samuelsen for Respondents.

OPINION

SULLIVAN, J.

In these proceedings, presented by two separate petitions upon a single record,[1] petitioner Rose W. Lamb, widow of the decedent John H. Lamb, seeks review of the decision after reconsideration of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lamb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. McAllister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API