Kushner v. City of Albany
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The Appellate Division properly determined that plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact sufficient to withstand a motion for a directed verdict on the question of whether plaintiffs alleged injuries resulted from an affirmative act of negligence that would preclude defendant City of Albany from relying on its prior written notice law (see Amabile v City of Buffalo, 93 NY2d 471, 473-474 [1999]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. Incorporated Village of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Arzeno v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Calabrese v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Guss v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Shufeldt v. City of KingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.