Legal Opinion
Manitex International, Inc. v. Parimal
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 22, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01037Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, No. 3:20-cv-1037 (MPS) v. PARIMAL, Defendant. RULING ON MOTION TO REMAND I. Background On July 9, 2020, Plaintiff Manitex International, LLC (“Manitex”) brought this action in state court against the Defendant, an individual whose only name is Parimal. ECF No. 1-1 at 2. Manitex sought to recover the sum of $60,000 from Parimal based on breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims. Id. at 3-4. Parimal removed the case on July 23, 2020, citing diversity jurisdiction, providing notice of a related…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 919, Afl-Cio v. Centermark Properties Meriden Square, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Michael A. Lupo v. Human Affairs International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James v. Aquavella and Salmon C. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.