Legal Opinion

Tanner v. City of Federal Way

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 18, 2000No. 44245-7-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

— A juvenile defendant was detained in jail for four days after he failed to appear for trial. The prosecutor *3had mistakenly filed the criminal complaint against him in adult court. He sued the prosecutor and the City, relying on Kalina v. Fletcher, 522 U.S. 118, 125-26, 118 S. Ct. 502, 507, 139 L. Ed. 2d 471 (1997) for the proposition that the prosecutor’s conduct amounted to that of a complaining witness, and therefore was not immune from liability. We hold that a prosecutor does not act as a complaining witness by certifying the presence of reasonable grounds to believe that the accused…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Kalina v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Musso-Escude v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Musso-Escude v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Tanner v. City of Federal WayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Brown v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. Rindal v. McDermottDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API