Legal Opinion

Sealy Realty Co. v. Brangato

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1969No. 11200PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLADNEY, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for a real estate commission. The defendant-appellant assigns error to the holding by the trial court that a conveyance made by defendant to Lemuel Sliman was an act of sale rather than a pignorative contract.

Joe Brangato, the owner of a lot on Line Avenue in Shreveport, listed Sealy Realty as exclusive agent to find a buyer for his property. The agreement executed January 11, 1967 recited in part:

“* * * I hereby employ said AGENT as my sole and EXCLUSIVE AGENT to sell for me the following described property: * * *…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marbury v. ColbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  2. Latiolais v. BreauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Jackson v. GolsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Bagley v. BourqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. Coddou v. GrosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sealy Realty Co. v. BrangatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  2. Sealy Realty Co. v. BrangatoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API