Hill v. Palmer
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Kearney county. Tried below before Gaslin, J. Worthen Collector v. .Quinn, 12 S. W. Rep. [Ark.], 156. Binlcert v. R. Co.T 98 111., 218; Ream v. Stone, 102 Id., 359; Kirkwood v,. Magill, 6 Kan., 540.
1Opinion of the Court
Cobb, Ch. J.
The plaintiff below replevied of the plaintiff in error the following goods and chattels:
Eleven pairs Walker boots, at $1.75................ $19 75
Twelve pairs Blucker shoes, at $1.75............... 21 00
Ten pairs Nelson & Son, at $3.60................... 36 00'
Eleven pairs Nelson & Son, at $2.20............... 24 20-
Of the value of one hundred dollars and ninety-
five cents...............................................$100 95
alleging that he wrongfully and unlawfully detained the same for eighteen days, to his damage $-, and that the same were not taken in execution, or any…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Crawford v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Reynolds v. FisherNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Midland Guaranty & Trust Co. v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Farm & Cattle Loan Co. v. FaulknerWyoming Supreme Court · 1926