Legal Opinion

Ron Parrish v. Bentonville School District

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2018No. 17-1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge.

*891 Child L, Child A, Child G, and Child S are all children who attended elementary school for varying lengths of time in the Bentonville School District (District). Each child has been diagnosed with autism. The children allege the District denied them a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The claims on appeal fall under the IDEA, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , based on the right to bodily integrity and equal protection, § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wegener v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Anitra D. Davis v. U.S. Bancorp, Doing Business as U.S. Bank National Association John Doe Mary Roe Persons UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. J.M. Ex Rel. McCauley v. Francis Howell School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  5. I.Z.M. v. Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Day v. Cedar Rapids Community School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2021
  2. Domino Two, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
  3. Hermann v. Kirkwood R-7 School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API