Legal Opinion

Caro Bros. v. O. & C. R. R.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Douglas . County.

1Opinion of the Court

Service upon the cleric or agent of a corporation, under subdivision one of section fifty-four, session laws, 1876, is a substituted service, and the return of service must state the facts which authorize such substituted service. Therefore, where a service on the agent of a corporation in Douglas county, whose place of business was in Multnomah, a return of service as' follows:

State of Oregon, } County of Douglas, [ ss'

I hereby certify that I served the within summons within said county, this 15th day of September, 1882, on the within named Oregon and California Bailroad Company, by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oxford Iron Co. v. SpradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  2. People ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. Judge of the Saginaw Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Southern Express Co. v. HuntMississippi Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Malheur Irrigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ozark Marble Co. v. StillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Hildebrand v. United ArtisansOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Weaver v. Southern Oregon Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Mutzig v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API