Caro Bros. v. O. & C. R. R.
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Douglas . County.
1Opinion of the Court
Service upon the cleric or agent of a corporation, under subdivision one of section fifty-four, session laws, 1876, is a substituted service, and the return of service must state the facts which authorize such substituted service. Therefore, where a service on the agent of a corporation in Douglas county, whose place of business was in Multnomah, a return of service as' follows:
State of Oregon, } County of Douglas, [ ss'
I hereby certify that I served the within summons within said county, this 15th day of September, 1882, on the within named Oregon and California Bailroad Company, by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oxford Iron Co. v. SpradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
- People ex rel. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance v. Judge of the Saginaw Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Southern Express Co. v. HuntMississippi Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bailey v. Malheur Irrigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899
- Ozark Marble Co. v. StillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Hildebrand v. United ArtisansOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- Weaver v. Southern Oregon Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Mutzig v. HopeOregon Supreme Court · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.