Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Darrel Duane Grisel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2007No. 05-30585Published

1Dissent

BEA, Circuit Judge, with whom KLEINFELD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges,

join, dissenting:

The Supreme Court, as recently as April 18, 2007, has explained in clear terms the reason burglary is included as a predicate offense in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii):

The main risk of burglary arises not from the simple physical act of wrongfully entering onto another’s property, but rather from the possibility of a face-to-face confrontation between the burglar, and a third party — whether an occupant, a police officer, or a bystander— who comes to investigate.

Ja…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Willy Elmer SweetenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API