Legal Opinion

Ray v. Hill Veneer Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

This case was before us at a former term, 186 N. C., 773. Tbe first appeal was from a judgment of nonsuit, entered on motion of tbe defendant at tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence, and this was reversed. We are not now permitted to review any question which was then decided, as a party who loses in this Court may not have tbe case reheard by a second appeal. Holland v. R. R., 143 N. C., 435. Where a judgment of nonsuit has been reversed and, on a second trial, tbe plaintiff’s evidence is substantially tbe same as it was on tbe first bearing, tbe cause should be submitted to tbe jury, as tbe…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Rawls.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Clark v. . SweaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Nobles v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Holland v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. North Carolina Public Service Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCall v. Textile Industrial InstituteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Robinson v. . McAlhaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Newbern v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Winston Brick Manufacturing Co. v. HodginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Wall v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API